Dispute over control of NR sustainability platform
London – Tire manufacturers and NGOs are locked in a tug-of-war over the governance structure of the newly formed Global Platform for Sustainable Natural Rubber (GPSNR).
The “independent platform” was formally launched 25 Oct by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development’s (WBCSD) Tire Industry Project (TIP) to drive up the socio-economic and environmental performance of the NR value-chain.
Its formation was led by a working group of TIP member companies: Bridgestone, Continental, Cooper Tire & Rubber, Goodyear, Hankook, Kumho, Michelin, Pirelli, Sumitomo Rubber, Toyo Tire & Rubber and Yokohama Rubber.
A number of NGOs – Mighty Earth, WWF, Global Witness, Birdlife, Rainforest Alliance, FSC and ProForest – have also been involved in discussions around the set-up of the GPSNR.
“The platform will be independently managed and is being purposefully shaped through the collaboration of businesses and NGOs,” according to Gavin Whitmore, communication manager, TIP, WBCSD.
Stakeholders are continuing to meet to finalise operational details, including that of governance ahead of the ‘operational launch’ of the platform in March 2019, Whitmore said in a written statement to ERJ.
“All natural rubber stakeholder groups will have a vote and voting-weight will reflect stakeholder ownership, expertise and capacity to implement meaningful change,” he added. “TIP is looking to the GPSNR to achieve real change in the natural rubber supply chain.
“The experience of other platforms has demonstrated success is best achieved where voting weight reflects stakeholder ownership, expertise and capacity to implement meaningful change.”
But, for Liviya James, a spokeswoman for Mighty Earth, this is “just an elaborate way of saying ‘we won't give up control’.”
The platform voting-system, she said, should comprise 50% value-chain industry actors, and 50% small farmer representatives, NGOs, academia and other non-value-chain stakeholders.
As things stand, WBCSD TIP is in “complete control of the platform,” James continued. “It has been negotiating with NGOs for eight months and still has not come up with an equitable governance structure.”
Nevertheless, there is still some scope for negotiation, the spokeswoman noting that the TIP had agreed that the next set of talks at the end of November can be conducted by an independent ‘conflict mediator’.
But the tire industry must give up the idea of having the final say over platform decisions, insisted James.
“Standards have to be developed jointly and agreed mutually between value chain actors and non-value chain experts for the rubber industry to genuinely address its serious impacts on local communities and the environment in the tropics,” she concluded.
This article is only available to subscribers - subscribe today
Subscribe for unlimited access. A subscription to European Rubber Journal includes:
- Every issue of European Rubber Journal (6 issues) including Special Reports & Maps.
- Unlimited access to ERJ articles online
- Daily email newsletter – the latest news direct to your inbox
- Access to the ERJ online archive