Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • Rubber & Plastics News
Subscribe
  • My Account
  • LogIn
  • News
  • Technology Focus
    • Features
    • Technical Papers
    • Analysis: Rubber mixing plants of the future
      Analysis: US probes dumping by ESBR suppliers
      Opinion: Tire labels stuck in a rut
      Analysis: NR pricing takes one step forward, two steps back
    • White paper: Role of tire innerliners in improving 'in-use rolling resistance'
      White paper: Why tire air retention matters now more than ever
      Nippon Soda: Use of 1,2-polybutadiene in CSM rubber applications
      Elastomers for Sustainability Top 10
  • Events
    • ERJ Events
    • ERJ Livestreams & Webinars
    • Industry Events
    • Journey to Automation Awards 2020
      Sustainability: Top 10 E4S projects table
  • Maps & Reports
  • People
  • Directory
  • Digital Edition
  • Brainiac
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. News
July 03, 2018 12:00 AM

Doublestar wins partial summary judgment against Toyo

Shahrzad Pourriahi
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Print

    Los Angeles, California – A judge before the US District Court for the Central District of California has granted partial summary judgment to two Chinese tire makers in their long-standing litigation with Toyo Tire & Rubber Co.

    Doublestar Dong Feng Tyre Co. Ltd. and Qingdao Doublestar Industrial Tire Co. Ltd. asked for summary judgment to dismiss the request for treble damages made by Toyo and its US subsidiary in Toyo's case accusing the Doublestar companies of trade dress infringement and unfair competition.

    On 26 June, Judge Cormac Carney granted the Doublestar companies' motion as related to Toyo's lost profits based on Toyo's lost sales, disgorgement of Doublestar's profits based on unjust enrichment or Toyo's request for attorneys' fees.

    The case dates to February 2015, when Toyo sued Doublestar and related companies, accusing them of infringing the design of Toyo's Open Country M/T premium off-road tire.

    Carney partially granted Toyo's motion for summary judgment in the case on 12 April. Toyo then sought treble damages under the Lanham Act, which forbids trademark infringement, trademark dilution and false advertising.

    The Doublestar companies filed for partial summary judgment against Toyo 7 May, with a follow-up filing 21 May, accusing Toyo of misrepresenting the case to bolster its fraud claiToyo countered 4 June, stating that Doublestar's version of the case was "remarkably at odds with the evidence of record."

    In granting Doublestar's motion, Carney noted "numerous disputed issues of material fact" regarding Toyo's fraud claims against Doublestar, which led him to deny Doublestar's motion for summary judgment on that issue.

    On the trade dress issue, however, Carney partly granted Doublestar's motion.

    "Because Toyo has not presented any competent evidence of its own lost profits, Toyo cannot seek any damages under that theory," he wrote.

    Toyo's evidence of lost profits, according to Carney, was based on the "gut feeling" of Amy Coleman, Toyo's senior director of marketing, who said Toyo could have made half of the sales that went to Doublestar's infringing tire.

    "Coleman's arbitrary percentage is not a reasonably certain basis on which a jury could determine damages," he wrote.

    However, Toyo was free to seek damages against Doublestar for extraterritorial sales of the infringing tires before the entry of the final judgment, and also under a theory of unjust enrichment, Carney ruled.

    RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
    Bridgestone, Arlanxeo, Solvay launch tire technology platform
    Bridgestone, Arlanxeo, Solvay launch tire technology platform
    Trinseo taps KD Feddersen to supply soft-touch elastomers
    Trinseo taps KD Feddersen to supply soft-touch elastomers
    Cancarb starts up new carbon black unit
    Cancarb starts up new carbon black unit
    Free Newsletters

    Breaking news and in-depth coverage of essential topics delivered straight to your inbox.

    Subscribe today

    Get the latest news impacting the European rubber industry, from breaking news to razor-sharp analysis, in print and online.

    Subscribe now
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Youtube

    Logo
    Contact Us

    @ 2019 European Rubber Journal. 
    European Rubber Journal is published bi-monthly by NUERJ Ltd.

    Registered Office: Castle House, 89 High Street,
    Berkhamsted, Hertfordshire HP4 2DF, United Kingdom. 

    Tel. + 44 (0)203 196 0141 

    Registered No. 13104613 England

    Email: [email protected]

    Website www.european-rubber-journal.com

    Customer service 

    Tel. + 44 (0)203 196 0141 

     

    Resources
    • About us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Media Kit
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Copyright © 1996-2021. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
    • Technology Focus
      • Features
      • Technical Papers
    • Events
      • ERJ Events
      • ERJ Livestreams & Webinars
      • Industry Events
    • Maps & Reports
    • People
    • Directory
    • Digital Edition
    • Brainiac