Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • Rubber & Plastics News
Subscribe
  • My Account
  • LogIn
  • News
  • Technology Focus
    • Features
    • Technical Papers
    • Analysis: Rubber mixing plants of the future
      Analysis: US probes dumping by ESBR suppliers
      Opinion: Tire labels stuck in a rut
      Analysis: NR pricing takes one step forward, two steps back
    • Technical paper: Varying Si-substituents for rubber silanes
      White paper: Role of tire innerliners in improving 'in-use rolling resistance'
      White paper: Why tire air retention matters now more than ever
      Nippon Soda: Use of 1,2-polybutadiene in CSM rubber applications
  • Events
    • ERJ Events
    • ERJ Livestreams & Webinars
    • Industry Events
    • Journey to Automation Awards 2020
      Sustainability: Top 10 E4S projects table
  • Maps & Reports
  • People
  • Directory
  • Digital Edition
  • Brainiac
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. News
April 25, 2017 12:00 AM

US Supreme Court reverses damage award against Goodyear

Shahrzad Pourriahi
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Print

    Washington — In an 8-0 decision, the US Supreme Court reversed and remanded a $2.74 million (€2.5 million) damage award against Goodyear and two attorneys who represented the tire maker in a product liability lawsuit.

    Two lower courts erred in ordering Goodyear and attorneys Basil J. Musnuff and Graeme Hancock to pay all of the Haeger family's legal fees, instead of only those that arose specifically from the tire maker's alleged misconduct, the high court ruled in its April 18 opinion.

    The case began in 2003, when Leroy, Donna, Barry and Suzanne Haeger were injured in Arizona in the rollover crash of their Gulf Stream motor home.

    The Haegers sued Goodyear in 2005, claiming that the accident was caused by the failure of a Goodyear G159 tire that was original equipment on the motor home. The tire, they alleged, was never meant to be mounted on that vehicle.

    Goodyear settled with the Haegers in April 2010. However, the Haegers' attorney later learned of Goodyear tests disclosed in a subsequent lawsuit that the G159 tire got unusually hot at speeds of 55 to 65 mph.

    The Haegers sued Goodyear, Hancock and Musnuff, claiming they deliberately withheld relevant evidence. In November 2012, a judge in the Arizona federal district court ordered Goodyear and the attorneys to pay $2.74 million in attorneys' fees and court costs.

    In July 2015, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the district court 2-1. Musnuff appealed to the Supreme Court, which reversed and remanded the damages award April 18.

    Writing for the full court, Justice Elena Kagan noted that Goodyear and the Haegers largely agreed on the law at hand, but disagreed on its interpretation. In any case, she said, the court unanimously decided that Goodyear was correct in asserting that the award should be vacated and sent back to the trial court.

    "The Haegers' defence of the lower courts' reasoning is a non-starter," Kagan wrote. "Neither court used the correct legal standard."

    The district and appeals courts erred in disclaiming a causal link between the award and what they claimed was "truly egregious" behavior on Goodyear's part, according to Kagan.

    "A sanctioning court must determine which fees were incurred because of, and solely because of, the misconduct at issue, and no such finding lies behind the $2.7 million award made and affirmed below," she wrote.

    Goodyear said it was pleased with the Supreme Court decision, but declined further comment.

    Newly appointed Justice Neil Gorsuch did not participate in this case.

    RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
    Hexpol acquiring Spanish rubber compounder Unica
    Hexpol acquiring Spanish rubber compounder Unica
    Synthomer launches Asia innovation centre in Malaysia 
    Synthomer launches Asia innovation centre in Malaysia 
    Kuraray raising elastomer prices again
    Kuraray raising elastomer prices again
    Free Newsletters

    Breaking news and in-depth coverage of essential topics delivered straight to your inbox.

    Subscribe today

    Get the latest news impacting the European rubber industry, from breaking news to razor-sharp analysis, in print and online.

    Subscribe now
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Youtube

    Logo
    Contact Us

    @ 2019 European Rubber Journal. 
    European Rubber Journal is published bi-monthly by NUERJ Ltd.

    Registered Office: Castle House, 89 High Street,
    Berkhamsted, Hertfordshire HP4 2DF, United Kingdom. 

    Tel. + 44 (0)203 196 0141 

    Registered No. 13104613 England

    Email: [email protected]

    Website www.european-rubber-journal.com

    Customer service 

    Tel. + 44 (0)203 196 0141 

     

    Resources
    • About us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Media Kit
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Copyright © 2021. NUERJ LTD. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
    • Technology Focus
      • Features
      • Technical Papers
    • Events
      • ERJ Events
      • ERJ Livestreams & Webinars
      • Industry Events
    • Maps & Reports
    • People
    • Directory
    • Digital Edition
    • Brainiac